Sign in

Call to Action

Recent Comments


Author List


Category List


Blogroll


Search


Climate Change A Cattlemens Perspective
 

Posted on October 15, 2009 07:57 by Matt Hardecke

Global warming is a serious problem…wait…global cooling is going to destroy the world…wait…oh, we are just calling it global climate change now because the “experts” can’t decide if we are getting hotter or colder?  Sorry, I got confused.  The old adage of counting your chickens before they hatch or putting the cart before the horse seems to bare fruit here.  We can all agree and/or disagree about the validity of the climate change debate but what I want to focus on is best described by Jerry Mcguire “Show Me the Money”.  Lets take a look at the affect of the latest attempt to bow at the alter of Climate Change.

 

The legislators on capital hill are debating the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 (HR 2454) which is designed to restrict emissions from industry with a focus on industries that survive on coal, oil and natural gas.   This 1,427 page bill which has passed the House is on its way to the Senate which has about a 50/50 chance of passing.  If the Senate does pass it, it is highly likely that the President will sign it thus becoming law.  So what does this mean?  The

Heritage Foundation sites that over the next 23 years the economic loss to our economy will be $9.4 trillion.  It is estimated that the loss of jobs could be as high as 2.5 million jobs by 2035 and gas would increase as much as 58%.  The EIA which is the government’s official energy statistics department states concluded that the passage of the bill would mean the average American family’s cost would be as high as $830 a year.  FAPRI, which is a University of Missouri Agricultural think tank, estimated that a 1900 acre diversified farm in Missouri would see a $30,152 increase in operating expense because of the HR 2454. 

 

Given these statistics, why in the world would our “representatives” push this legislation through the House?  I posed this question to a Missouri Rep who voted for HR 2454, after I told him the statistics above, and he stated that he supported the bill because he thought it would reduce our dependence on foreign oil.  Unfortunately the way HR 2454 does this is by saddling American families and farmers with so much financial burden and additional energy cost that they will have no choice to reduce consumption.  That doesn’t seem right now does it!  

 

What does this mean for Young Producers?  On a pure economist view point, arbitrarily increasing the cost of a production for a product (beef for example) negatively shifts the supply curve of domestically produced product.  With no shift in global supply this puts domestic producers at a competitive disadvantage.  In other words, American cattle producers will experience higher cost of production while the rest of the world wont.  This is why some experts call HR 2454 a Cap and Tax legislation.  Through the actions of congress, cost of production will increase just like raising the tax rate.  It has the same consequences. The scary part is that this increased cost occurs regardless if you earn a profit or not which makes it is a lot more detrimental than the federal government raising income taxes (which is based on your taxable net income).  This means, as a Young Producer it will be harder and harder to make an adequate margin on your cattle.  For example, my cost to produce a round bale of hay (fertilizer, fuel, twine, labor etc.) was around $35 in 2009.  With the implementation of HR 2454, it would be more around $55.  That alone takes $100 of margin out of my net income per cow per year.  Honestly, that was about the entire margin that was there in 2009. 

 

If you noticed, I didn’t disagree on the occurrence of Climate Change.  I believe the jury is still out on the subject.   I just fear we are making sweeping changes to our societal structure based on the opinions of a few, the very opinions that can’t decide if we are getting hotter or colder.  I encourage you as a Young Producer, look behind what is said on the nightly news or banner ads.  The 1427 page bill can be viewed online.  If you can’t read the entire bill, there are paraphrases of the bill that are only 20 to 30 pages long.  If you do that, you will be way ahead of a lot of our representatives.  And remember, what happens in DC will come out of your check book!

 

What do you think?  Comment below or email me at hardeckecattle@hotmail.com  I enjoy reading everyone’s comments. 

 

Bookmark and Share

Comments

October 15. 2009 18:16

Matt

It sets a really dangerous precedent to disregard scientific consensus and claim "the jury's still out" when you don't agree with the conclusions. When the National Academy and top shelf peer-reviewed journals say there is complete consensus (which they do about climate change), then there IS consensus - and no number of ignorant opinions from congressmen, opportunistic authors and talk show hosts changes this.

There's no requirement that you care about climate change in order to be a good person - or that you think that the proposed "fixes" are worth it (I'm skeptical about this myself), but it's bad for our country to shout down the opinions of experts.

As an ag scientist, I find myself constantly fighting misinformation about the supposed "dangers" of genetic engineering. I don't have the training or experience to understand the data that the climate models are based on, but I know true scientific consensus when I see. It's incredibly arrogant to blow off experts (who've immersed themselves in a subject for decades) when you don't know the first thing about their subject.

There are no shortage of issues where the ag industry has science on its side against a superstitious and panicky public. Let's not shoot ourselves in the foot by attacking science.

Matt United States

Comments are closed